case laws of cartels in pakistan - An Overview
case laws of cartels in pakistan - An Overview
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing from the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it truly is convenient for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has arrived at to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got reached this sort of stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may perhaps seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence in the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
record from the department there is not any record offered whatsoever regarding promotion of your petitioner(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is often a horrifying reality, a particularly minimal threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
The issue here is that an accused may say that they intended to injure the target, but they didn't plan to eliminate them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a law that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Please note, In case you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Except case is tried using(Bail Matters)
Search for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Validate the information against other sources when feasible.
a hundred and website fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.